"I'm a saaaaad panda."
The good news for Newsome is that in addition to Royster he'll Have Derek Moye and Graham Zug to throw to, if he has time. In 2009 Moye caught 48 passes for 785 yards and 6 touchdowns. Zug caught 46 for 600 yards and 7 TD's. Not the best tandem in the universe, but still pretty good.
On defense the Nitts will have to replace linebackers Navarro Bowman , Josh Hull and Sean Lee, and DT Jared Odrick. Even for "Linebacker U" replacing 3 starting LB's is a tall order. Are the new parts on offense and defense too much to overcome? Against the top 3 teams in the Big Ten, yes.
Youngstown State (W): It's Youngstown State....
@Alabama (L): As much as it pains me to say this, I'll be rooting for PSU not to lose to Alabama. Notice that I didn't say win. Sure Alabama's defense has almost no one back from 2009's run, but it's at Alabama and they still have Mark Ingram running the ball. Could be over by half time.
(Ed Note: from what I have read, this is a game that was rescheduled from a couple years ago. So you get retroactive credit for scheduling a tough one. However, outside of this game when was the last time that PSU scheduled another top 10 opponent in a home and home?)
Kent State (W): Kent State is still Kent State.
Temple (W): Penn State loves to schedule terrible non-conference opponents.
(Temple is the least bad of non-conference games, but Temple hasn't beaten PSU since 1941. Also, don't use "Heisman Candidate" so loosely. No chance that guy wins even if he puts up huge un-godly numbers.)
@Iowa (L): Adrian Clayborn shows that he's the real deal, Kevin Newsome has a bad day.
Illinois (W): Much needed after the trip to Kinnick.
BYE WEEK
@Minnesota (W): Unless Kevin Newsome is worse than advertised, Penn State should win here.
Michigan (W): Two in a row. Velcro or Fivecier like to toss the ball to guys wearing the wrong colored shirts. It could be a close game with PSU's new line-backing corps for 2010 against the running back that occasionally throws and takes snaps under center.
Northwestern (W): Talent Gap, and it's in Happy Valley.
@OSU (L): Remember those t-shirts you made? What about those Daryll Clark for president comments? Yeah, you'll regret those. Saaaaad paaaaandaaaasssss.
Indiana (@FedEX Field) (W): I don't know why Penn State would agree to play here, unless the check that Dan Snyder wrote then was "Haynesworthesque". This game will be closer than we all think at this point. Indiana can chuck the ball around with that spread/pistol stuff they run. Penn State should win based on raw talent alone.
(Ed. Note: apparently it was Indiana who sold their home game here. Makes sense, they probably stand to make more money when compared to taking the home gate, concession sales, etc. Not sure why I would know this, but thanks for the info)
Michigan State (W): I had a tough time with this one, and I explained it all in the MSU preview last week. It's gonna be a tight game, and will come down to whoever makes less mistakes, as usual. Kirk Cousins could make PSU pay dearly, but I give the edge to PSU at home.
Final Prediction: After running through the 2010 season Penn State wins the games they should win and loses the ones they should. I don't think there will be many surprises here, unless you're Royster who wants to send Paterno "out on top"9-3 overall and 6-2 in the conference. Going to eat some steak at the Outback Bowl in lovely Tampa, Florida.





