![]() |
| What do I care about Buckeye fans?? |
Before I begin, I do want to say that I do
respect many of the things Paterno has done in his career. His dedication to
his school is unmatched by anyone. Ever. I have always laughed at Browns fans
who said that Tressel is going to coach the Browns. Tressel's dream job is Ohio
State, and I never see him coaching anywhere else, he is totally dedicated to
the Buckeyes. Paterno has the same level of dedication as Tress, but has had it
for FOUR times as long. Also, he has an extremely low salary (relatively
speaking). He makes slightly more than $1 million per year, much less than guys
like Saban, Meyer, and even Coach Tressel. And I don't remember any scandals or
excess criminal activity at Penn State, unlike Florida State under Bobby Bowden, UNC
under Butch Davis, USC under Pete Carroll, and especially Florida under Urban Meyer.
Alright, that is more Joe Pa love than I have
ever shown in the rest of my life combined. Back to the original point I wanted
to make with this article, which is that Paterno's milestone is more or less a
joke. Paterno has won only 3 Big Ten Titles in his entire 44 year career!
What's that you say? Oh yes, I forgot to mention that Penn State has only been
playing in the Big Ten since 1993. Fine, so Paterno has only won 3 Big Ten
Titles in 17 years. That's much better.
It also brings up another point I wanted to
make, and that point is that Paterno's two National Championships came before
he played in a legitimate conference. Hell, they came before he played in any conference.
Isn't that the one knock people have against Boise State and TCU and Utah, that
it doesn't matter if they go undefeated every year because they don't play a
grinding schedule? If the BCS had existed during Penn State's two titles under
Joe Pa, the computers would have laughed them out of the room, much they they
do to Boise State, TCU and Utah at the end of every year. The Big East was
founded in 1979, the ACC in 1953, and the Big Ten has been around forever. If
Paterno and Penn State wanted to join a power conference, they could have
pushed to do so 20 years earlier. The fact is that they liked playing easier
schedules and still getting the same amount of praise.
Big Ten
|
||||
Team
|
Wins
|
Losses
|
Ties
|
Win %
|
Ohio State
|
106
|
29
|
1
|
0.779412
|
Michigan
|
94
|
42
|
0
|
0.691176
|
Penn State
|
86
|
50
|
0
|
0.632353
|
Wisconsin
|
79
|
54
|
3
|
0.580882
|
Iowa
|
71
|
64
|
1
|
0.522059
|
Overall
|
||||
Team
|
Wins
|
Losses
|
Ties
|
Win %
|
Ohio State
|
170
|
43
|
1
|
0.794393
|
Michigan
|
146
|
64
|
0
|
0.695238
|
Penn State
|
147
|
62
|
0
|
0.703349
|
Wisconsin
|
144
|
66
|
4
|
0.672897
|
Iowa
|
119
|
86
|
1
|
0.57767
|
Since joining the Big Ten, Paterno has had 7
double digit win seasons in 17 years (41% of the time). Compare that to before
the Big Ten, when he reached double digit wins in 14 out of 27 seasons (51% of
the time) and the evidence is piling on.
If you want to say that Joe Paterno has done
great things for Penn State, has won and won with class, is a wonderful person
and family man, then that is fine, I will believe you. But the one thing that I
will NEVER get over is that he isn't even really the coach now. In the early
2000's, Penn State was a very, very bad football team, going 5-7 in 2000, 5-6
in 2001, 9-4 in 2002, 3-9 (1-7 Big Ten) in 2003, and 4-7 (2-6 Big Ten) in 2004.
Then, Joe Paterno ADMITTED that he was giving much of
the control of the team to his assistants. What were the results? Since giving
up control after 2004, Penn State has gone 51-13 (not counting this season).
Penn State is now better when Paterno is not coaching.
![]() |
| Do Penn State fans think about him? |
If that is too hard for you to handle, watch
Paterno on the sidelines of a game. He has no headphones on. How does he
communicate with his offensive and defensive coordinators in the booth? He
doesn't. Tom Bradley (defense) and Galen Hall (offense) call the entire game
with absolutely zero input from the "head coach."
All this and I haven't even mentioned how he has
had so many surgeries on his hip he shouldn't even be on the sidelines. Look, Joe Paterno was a very good football coach, who ran a clean
program, never threatened to leave his school for more money, and won a lot of
games. And for that, I do respect him. But passing Bear Bryant and keeping up
with Bobby Bowden clouded his judgement, and forced him to stay on at Penn
State far longer than he should have. He no longer draws up offensive or
defensive gameplans, or even visits recruits. He is hurting his
program, but has developed too much of an ego to realize it. And for that, I do
not respect him.
To answer my question in the title, no, we
should not really care. In my opinion, every win from 2005 on might as well be
credited to Tom Bradley, leaving Paterno stuck at 343 wins. When he starts
coaching again, I will start counting again.


